Abstract
IgD myeloma is a rare hematologic malignancy for which clinical and biological features and patient outcomes have not been extensively studied. However, previous studies found 3.1% IgD myeloma prevalence in Asian myeloma patients, and with the high incidence of 6%, especially for younger than 50 years with 10.3% in Chinese myeloma patients (Kim K. et al. Am J Hematol. 2014, Lu J. et al. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2016). Therefore, to further assess the frequency and the specific characteristics and evaluate the outcome of patients with IgD myeloma, we carried out a multicenter retrospective study in Chinese and Korean patients from AMN project with diagnosis of IgD myeloma.
A total of 308 patients from 22 centers were included in this analysis. The median age at diagnosis was 56 years with a male predominance (65.70%). Anemia and renal dysfunction were found in 86.7% and 46.2%, respectively. Renal failure is more common at presentation with an increase in serum creatinine (> 2 mg/dL) in more than 10% various series of IgD MM. The bias for λ light chain expression with a reversed light chain ratio is a characteristic feature of IgD MM, which showed 95.79% of patients with IgD λ light chain in Asian patients. DS stage 1, 2, and 3 were showed in 1.30%, 5.84%, and 92.86%, respectively. The chromosomal aberration accounted in 58.14% and t(11;14) was the most common cytogenetic finding (40.57%). Median overall survival (OS) was 39.2 months (95% CI 31.56-41.43). Higher International Staging System (ISS) stages III (62.62%) might be associated with worse survival (P = 0.02), while ISS stages I and II were seen in 16.39% and 20.98%. Patents received with stem cell transplantation showed better survival rates. New drugs including bortezomib, thalidomide, and lenalidomide were used in more than 60% of all patients and affected OS when used as a first-line treatment.
In this multicenter retrospective study from Chinese and Korean IgD myeloma patients, we found that IgD MM more likely presented at advanced stage and showed a more aggressive clinical course. The underlying tumor biology responsible for these differences remains to be determined.
No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Author notes
Asterisk with author names denotes non-ASH members.
This feature is available to Subscribers Only
Sign In or Create an Account Close Modal